New User Trouble
Mr. New User, Don’t forget that you still need to produce printed documents
I find many new users get obsessed with modeling and don’t want to hear about the 2D world. This is both great and a disaster. I love to see people excited about modeling, about leaving the world of flatcad for good. But… We need to produce legible prints in a timely manner. If you ignore dimensions, notes, sheeting drawings, etc. it’s very easy to fall into The Ugly Trap.
What’s The Ugly Trap? It’s when you spend a week working on a new project, but at the end you have an ugly unresolved model and horrendous (or non-existent) drawings that someone who doesn’t understand BIM won’t see the value of. They’ll ask questions like “What have you been doing all week?” or “I hate computers” or “if we were doing this in AutoCAD or by hand…” Your work is clouded by ugliness. And it’s easy to get disheartened and disgruntled. You’ll want to scream “It’s early! There’s so much information in there. It’s coordinated! Look past the materials. Look past those lines, they’ll be resolved later, I swear! I promise!” Meanwhile the one guy still using a legacy program turns out a pile of trash that looks amazing. Too bad none of the sections match the elevations or plan. Early in SD no one cares (much). They should, but it’s easier to value 3 pretty drawings that don’t connect than 30 ugly ones that do. You might want to focus only on 3D modeling when learning ArchiCAD, but remember you still need to produce pretty drawings in a timely manner. Don’t get 80 hours into a project and then realize you can’t show anyone what you’ve done in traditional formats. Because face it, for the foreseeable future most of us will still be creating sheets and sheets of plans, sections, elevations, details and schedules.
Ms. New User, Remember that your layout book should progress at the same pace as your model
Here’s a rhetorical question: when should you make sure your sheets are laid out? Once your floor plans are blocked out. At that point you can lay out every section, elevation, interior elevation, and plan on a sheet. Don’t worry that your elevations have no roofs and your sections have no floors. That’s okay. And don’t worry that there might be some views to add later. You should know the scope of your project early on and be able to print progress sets whenever necessary. Do not wait until the end or until ‘it’s ready to sheet’. Think of the first pass of the layout book like the cartoon sets many of us once sketched out by hand on scrap pieces of paper. But better. And smarter. And much more useful. Every marker on every plan should be linked to a sheeted view before the first printing of that plan. This cartoon set will help you avoid The Ugly Trap because you’ll be very aware of how legible your work is at the end of every day. And unlike the static cartoon set of yore, the ArchiCAD version continues to automatically update and evolves into your finished product.
A Question for all of us
If you have 40 hrs to learn ArchiCAD, how much of that should be spent on modeling and how much on text, dimensions, sheet layout, masking (it happens, learn it), theory on how to work in ArchiCAD, etc. I don’t have an exact answer, but my gut tells me half the time should be dedicated to non-3D. How does that sound? Am I crazy?
note 1: If you’re lucky your office has a template that already has placed views on sheets so the task of creating a cartoon set should be that much easier. If your office template doesn’t have placed views in the layout book, update your template so that it does.
note 2: Clearly blocking out your layout book early in the project won’t completely save you from The Ugly Trap. There are many other techniques and tricks you should also be aware of (like fast, clean plans, smart use of default materials, hiding clutter, choosing your 3D battles, smart masking…), but those will have to wait for future blog posts.
Mats
Very true facts written in a positive way. This is a must read for beginners and intermediates alike.
Jared Banks
Mats, Thanks. I appreciate that. Jared
Danj
Those roof notes, arrow with fall arrow, are they a label of some sort or is that just 2d drafting.
Jared Banks
Those are just 2d drafting, but could easily be automatic labels linked to the roof IDs. That will probably be the case on the next project. What’s not included in that image (but probably should be) is the schedule next to it that is pulling the surface area of each of the 3 roof types.
Jared Banks
Danj, just updated my template. Now those roof labels (1/4″ per 1-0″, Green Roof, etc.) are now automatic labels that look very, very similar. Thanks for keeping me honest!
Dave Olufs
I resemble your remarks…
Dave Olufs
After many deliveries with my Legacy program, I did my first AC15 delivery… with schedules, plans and details.
I transferred a lot of drawing notes to worksheets for future use. Schedules, details, interior elevations, plan views were created but not linked. Interior elevations were redrawn in 2D for quality output…
All in all, I’m happy with the results but need to start linking things together. It was a small 3.2K SF interior build-out, simple. Now I need to transition to 40K new construction.
Love your posts!
Jared Banks
Dave, Thanks. Glad you were able to do your first AC15 delivery; that’s fantastic. And sorry I dropped the ball on looking at those drawings you sent me too many months ago. Clearly it’s been kind of crazy and hectic on my end since the beginning of 2012. As you get ready to start the 40K new construction, perhaps we should schedule an hour or two training session to talk about what worked and what didn’t with the interior build-out. From seeing your previous work, my guess is it won’t take much to make some big leaps into more connected 3D. I know you can do it!
Yesterday I did a training session via ichat. It worked great and allowed me to have mouse control of the remote computer as well. It made talking about the project and navigating really easy. I could mainly watch, but then take control for a few critical moments.
Sam Moodie
Graphisoft should do more to promote the 2D capability ArchiCAD. It’s too common for a new user to produce 3D visuals with AC then revert to AutoCAD LT for the tender package.
I know its a poor workflow to break the views down to 2D, but under time pressure, it should be promoted to new users as a work around whilst they develop the the extra though process required to get good-looking 2D straight from the model.
Jared Banks
Sam, I definitely agree that the 2D capabilities of ArchiCAD are underrated. As a 2D program (cost aside), it is still a fantastic competitor.
HOWEVER… I can only think of one or two instances in all my years of using ArchiCAD when breaking views down to 2D is a good idea. The better solution, if you have to, is to overlay 2D on top of the 3D. This then makes it a semi-linked solution and keeps the user on the path to attaining a pure 3D set. De-linking in every case is a step backwards. Better to mask over the 3D model if necessary. And then each new project aim to do less masking and 2D. On the first project you might have an interior elevation that is 80% masked off. But a few projects later, you’ll get that percentage way down. If you are always de-linking to get that last mile you have less incentive and less practice decreasing your workarounds.
All that said, yes there needs to be more written about how it’s okay as a beginner to do a mixture of 2D and 3d to produce good drawings. And how to make the transition to less and less 2D fixes. That has always been at the core of everything I’ve written about ArchiCAD over the past 2 years. I realize I need to write many more blog posts about creating good-looking drawings, whether w/ 2D, 3D, or a combination. This is a good reminder. Thanks for your comments.
Eric Bobrow
This is an excellent article, Jared. I agree with you – this aspect of the process strategy is often neglected or ignored and can cause serious issues in an office.
Jared Banks
Eric, Thanks!
Paul Setti
Jared,
A very nice article. I have recently begun working in Archicad with the soul interest of producing well coordinated 2d drawings. Sounds backwards I know, but after my 25 years of designing I agree that what is important is the information needed to build a building. I love AC and wouldn’t trade it in for anything. Still learning the output stuff. Love to model and know how easy it is to get caught up in the precision of the model. I have realized and now you have confirmed it. Overlay is COOL! especially stairs. More importantly is the proper phasing of output for progress. I enjoy your articles. Now I have to learn more about the ins and outs of templating, Linking notes that I use and using schedules WELL.
Jared Banks
Paul, thanks. Don’t be surprised that, once you can produce beautiful drawings based on ever improving models, you’ll start finding other uses for those models!
Daniel
Nice article, this read like a letter to me as
I find myself in the ugly trap more often than I’d like!
Each drawing set I produce in Archicad I think I have got my head around the various issues we have here in the office only to find on the next one I haven’t!
The main problem is getting the elevations/sections to read as we want without overlining them (which I just don’t like doping). I wish elements in archicad had options to choose linetype/weight for plan and elevation.
What I think would help new/intermediate users like myself is getting a full BIM documentation file but I find these are hard to get your hands on which is fair enough.
Jared Banks
Daniel, I’m glad the article spoke to you! I’ll hopefully write a post tonight that answers the question about air lines. I struggled with that for a long time too. I think I’ve talked about it before on the blog, but part of the answer is simple. Stop doing them and find a new model-based solution. And I’ll think about a way to share a completed file. I’ve been asked before and I know it’d be super helpful for so many people.
Paul Setti
Daniel I’m on the same page. Having the same struggles with different views. Elevations, Setions Etc. Details.
Daniel
That would be fantastic Jared.
I guess the frustration lies in the fact that I’m trying to find the model based solution without luck!
The office has no template so or examples to work from so I’m in the dark somewhat.
Cheers
Jared Banks
No template! Yikes. That’s trouble. 🙂 I’ve got some ideas for cleaning up my template and creating a sample project to share with people. Wouldn’t be until after 16 and probably late summer at the earliest. But I have some cool ideas and high hopes. Feel free to e-mail me with anything you’re struggling with and maybe I can do a blog post that deals with some of those issues.
Daniel
We have recently purchased the Eric Bobrow’s mastertamplate so am in the process of modifying it to suit.
Look forward to the sample file/post!
Ben Ling
I’ve used AC since version 4.5, and is still struggling with this problem of when to unlink 3D for good 2D sheets.
I’d appreciate if you could detail how to mask
3D with 2D.
Jared Banks
Ben, I do have a post in the works about smart masking. In the meantime, you should check out this post: https://shoegnome.com/2011/12/18/three-graphic-shortcuts-for-sections-and-interior-elevations/ The two videos in it should give you some tips.
But I want to focus on the initial problem you mention. The answer is quite simple. You should NEVER unlink 3D to create good 2D sheets. There is absolutely no need for that. Okay, truth be told, I can think of 1 project in the past 5 years where I unlinked the detached garage drawings because there was a change made during construction. I needed to issue new drawings, and I didn’t want to deal with learning about any repercussions of the change (since the issues would be resolved in the field anyways). That one unnecessary anecdote aside, delinking only leads to trouble and a loss of efficiency. If your model needs help to look pretty, I recommend using fills over the live model, and then a few polylines. But I’d rather focus on why your 3D models aren’t generating good live drawings and fix those issues. Because they can and should. Everything you see on this blog are live views. Sorry I really don’t like to hear talk of unlinking views. Unless it’s to discuss how to do it less.
Pingback: I want to see your plan Printed Out. And Soon. | Shoegnome