Building Intelligence Model
What if we’ve had it wrong this whole time. What if the I in BIM isn’t Information. What if it’s Intelligence. We went from pencil to CAD (Computer-Aided Design) to BIM (Building Information Models). But what if we are really just still in the process of moving to real BIM, to Building Intelligence Models.
Deep data is useless if we drown in it, or can’t benefit (profit) from it. We need relevant information. We need curation and intelligence. We all want information, sure, but what we need is understanding. Our models are good if they have lots of information in them, but wouldn’t they be so much better if they had lots of intelligence in them?
Perhaps you’re familiar with the Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom continuum. There are tons of examples and diagrams out there to look at. It’d be easy enough for me to make a BIM-centric pyramid, but I’ll refrain. Just Google it. Or go to Wikipedia. That concept is at the root of this Information to Intelligence shift. We need to not only be smarter about what goes into the models, we also need the models to use that data in a better way. We need the models to have Intelligence so that they understand what information they contain. Why? Because of two inevitabilities.
The future is augmented reality. I believe this more and more everyday. Every time I write about the possibilities of what architects can do, I always start thinking about augmented reality. BIM linked to smartphone Apps. BIM linked to Google Glass. BIM linked to our buildings, our transportation, our brains…for that impending future, we need our BIMs to be better. We need our BIMs to be ready to integrate with the user experience of the buildings. We need our Building Intelligence Models to be responsive and active, not static repositories of information.
The Robots are Coming
One day I hope to never model again. I hope to have a conversation with a computer and have it figure out the details. It can do the lower order mechanics, while I focus on higher order thinking. If I just keep modeling, if we all just keep doing the same tasks as we did a hundred years ago but with better tools, there’s a limit to what we can charge, and what we can offer. But…if like so much else in modern society, we take advantage of automation and technology. If we stop doing the things that can be mechanized or techno-ized, then we can really increase our value. But to do this, to really leave the grunt work to our tools, we need better tools. We need to go from Building Information Models to Building Intelligence Models to Building Wisdom Models. Because with BWM, we will truly do wondrous and world changing things. We will have models that know not only what to do with the information, but why that information needs to be used. And then we designers will go from creators of design to organizers of design. We will be able to shift from making patterns to connecting patterns, from micro-design to macro-design.
One Step at a Time
Perhaps before we get to Building Intelligence Models, we need to focus on Building Intelligence (into) Models. What do you think? How are you turning Information into Intelligence in your models?
Subscribe to my blog to read more about the future of BIM and the tricky world of being an Architect in the 21st century: Shoegnome on Facebook, Twitter, and RSS feed. And now you can join the LinkedIN group too!
Bonus note: I’m not the first one to talk about Building Wisdom Models. Here’s a post from a few years ago by Randy Deutsch that comes to that same term, but from a different angle and with different conclusions.
MC
Would an early example of this be storey linking? A column for example has information but now has the intelligence to know if something else changes it has to change with it
Jared Banks
Definitely. This actually leads into a post I’ve been working on for awhile, which is about understanding the dividing line between BIM and CAD. I’ll have to put that back on the top of the list of things to complete. For BIM to really be about intelligence, elements need to have both self-awareness and environmental-awareness. An element needs to know what it is (say a wall) and where it is (story one). And the degree of awareness describes the intelligence of the system. A wall knows that it’s on story one AND changes based on changes to story one, etc. But I’m getting ahead of myself. More soon. Hopefully.
Jeffry Murphy
That is an excellent perception. Who knows, right? Soon, you will be right and it will not be a long wait. Thanks! http://www.fischerdesigngroup.com/
Erik
Stop making sense dude. It’s becoming annoying. 😉 Another great post.
Jared Banks
Thanks. Much appreciated. I’ll do my best to be nonsensical later in the month.
Pingback: Self-awareness vs Environmental-awareness: A working definition of BIM
Christian Ehl
Spot on and the robots are closer than you might think . The first step will be automatically checking data quality and making suggestions on how to optimize based on self-learning intelligent algorithms. I published an article about the vision a few days ago in AECbytes and am currently working on this topic…
http://www.aecbytes.com/buildingthefuture/2015/BuildingBots.html
Jared Banks
Very interesting article. Thanks for sharing the link. I’m really curious to learn more about what you have in store for BIMQ. Especially because in the article you make some bold predictions for the coming year!