BIM Dream Team
About a year ago I talked to a firm that was looking to build a “BIM dream team” (their words). This was the group that was going to revolutionize how the firm worked and be the core of the company’s future. What was the boss’s number one requirement for these new hires? They all needed to know a certain software. Hint, that software’s name rhymes with Revit. Oh wait, that wasn’t a hint at all. If that one requirement wasn’t met, all other qualifications were ignored. That’s crap.
This article from Cadalyst sums up my opinions on the subject perfectly:
“So, the short answer to the question of “whom do we hire?” is simply to hire potential. Hire someone you would want to spend time talking with and teaching.”
Hopefully the era of firms trying to fix their BIM credentials through misplaced hiring practices is nearing its end. But probably not.
(a different BIM dream team from 2015)
@bpaletz
I can see both points, the requirement to know Revit first simply so production can continue with the least amount of interruption; but to also hire potential to ensure the future success of the firm and the satisfaction of all that are involved.
Jared Banks
But what is ‘least amount of interruption’ worth? If we hire people for the long term, or even the near term, what is more important: good productivity during the first two weeks or great productivity during the first six months? Focusing on the immediate needs risks making a short term bet instead of a long term investment. And it’s also worth considering that just because someone can use a given program doesn’t mean they are productive or efficient.
I’m a firm believer that someone who is truly capable at one BIM platform will also be capable on any other BIM platform; and will learn it fast.
Patrick
I think the learning curve for BIM software can impede the desire to migrate to current standards. A lot of firms mis-use their software, some mis-use their employees. An intern that was previously a drafter, needs to be able to complete more than just menial tasks. I honestly think that there is little room on a “BIM team” for people who do not fully understand what the goals of the entire project are, from design to documentation to construction. Due to the need for a more well rounded employee I can understand the desire to exclusively hire people who know the software, since you are very likely going to have to educate them in construction practices, energy performance, environmental concerns etc.
I also understand that a person who has all the required skills to execute the design and documentation of a project can more easily learn new software and meet expectations than can a person with the required software knowledge but no understanding of structural design, detailing, proper material use, etc.
Jared Banks
I need to find a way to add likes to my comments. I don’t have much to add at the moment, but I really like what you have to say Patrick. Thanks! In some ways BIM just messes everything up. Means there’s a HUGE opportunity for young firms that get it right from the start or established firms who can get ahead of the curve.
Pingback: Architects are really just asking for Haptic Feedback » Shoegnome